<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Reeltime Videoworks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reeltimevideoworks.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reeltimevideoworks.com</link>
	<description>Video Production for Vancouver and the Lower Mainland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple’s Pro Res — Which one? by nwsam</title>
		<link>http://reeltimevideoworks.com/blog/apples-pro-res-which-one/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>nwsam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeltimevideoworks.com/?p=537#comment-317</guid>
		<description>&quot;Pro Res 422 is the highest most of us will need to get great quality that can stand up to many editing cycles without falling apart. Under normal circumstances here is virtually no perceivable difference between this and Pro Res 422 HQ.&quot;

Thank you for a simple, clear overview.

The variations in video formats was killing me. The convolution slowed my progress, frustrated my projects, and outright discouraged me from making more videos. It has taken me years of reading and trial and error to arrive at this point of confidence and know how to simply encode everything as 422 and not worry. Thank you for the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Pro Res 422 is the highest most of us will need to get great quality that can stand up to many editing cycles without falling apart. Under normal circumstances here is virtually no perceivable difference between this and Pro Res 422 HQ.”</p>
<p>Thank you for a simple, clear overview.</p>
<p>The variations in video formats was killing me. The convolution slowed my progress, frustrated my projects, and outright discouraged me from making more videos. It has taken me years of reading and trial and error to arrive at this point of confidence and know how to simply encode everything as 422 and not worry. Thank you for the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PMW-EX1R flange back adjust by Bob Cole</title>
		<link>http://reeltimevideoworks.com/blog/pmw-ex1r-flangeback-adjust/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeltimevideoworks.com/?p=657#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Don, thanks for the recipe.  Just one question: You said &quot;Set lens to Auto Focus, Focus Ring pushed forward, Auto Iris, Macro Off.&quot;

Did you mean that Auto Iris should be set to on or off?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, thanks for the recipe.  Just one question: You said “Set lens to Auto Focus, Focus Ring pushed forward, Auto Iris, Macro Off.”</p>
<p>Did you mean that Auto Iris should be set to on or off?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Salai Ko Tin Maung Oo teaser trailer by Don Greening</title>
		<link>http://reeltimevideoworks.com/videos/salai-ko-tin-maung-oo-teaser-trailer/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Greening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 06:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeltimevideoworks.com/?p=807#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Hi Mr. Thanga,

Thank you for taking the time to comment. Right now I&#039;m working on a DVD set that will show the 35th commemoration in its entirety, or most of it. I&#039;m saddened that you weren&#039;t able to attend. Like yourself, there were several people that were expected to attend but at the last minute weren&#039;t able to make it. Hopefully the forthcoming DVD set will help others to relive this very special day.

Cheers,
Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mr. Thanga,</p>
<p>Thank you for taking the time to comment. Right now I’m working on a DVD set that will show the 35th commemoration in its entirety, or most of it. I’m saddened that you weren’t able to attend. Like yourself, there were several people that were expected to attend but at the last minute weren’t able to make it. Hopefully the forthcoming DVD set will help others to relive this very special day.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Salai Ko Tin Maung Oo teaser trailer by Lal Thanga</title>
		<link>http://reeltimevideoworks.com/videos/salai-ko-tin-maung-oo-teaser-trailer/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Lal Thanga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 03:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeltimevideoworks.com/?p=807#comment-314</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing the clip. I feel empty for missing the event in Canada for a reason. This one will fulfill my absence.

Thanks and long live the true memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing the clip. I feel empty for missing the event in Canada for a reason. This one will fulfill my absence.</p>
<p>Thanks and long live the true memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ki Pro Mini and Time Code by Don Greening</title>
		<link>http://reeltimevideoworks.com/blog/ki-pro-mini-and-time-code/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Greening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 05:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeltimevideoworks.com/?p=731#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Hello Patrick,

Since you posted your question about controlling multiple Ki Pro Minis using the LANC function I&#039;ve been asking around about which controller will do the job reliably but no one seems to have a definitive answer. It seems as though most people who need to control multiple units are using the hard wired ethernet gang control function and just using the web-based master controller screen. Ultimately, the LANC way of doing things would not be nearly as clumsy as using a laptop. You obviously must have upgraded your KPM firmware to v.2.5 otherwise the LANC wouldn&#039;t work at all, but as far as getting reliable control of the start/stop LANC commands is something I&#039;m not able to help you with. I don&#039;t use the LANC function myself so I&#039;m probably not the best person to ask. If you want to read more about the Ki Pro Mini gang record function turn to page 45 in the KPM owner&#039;s manual, PDF version.

- Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Patrick,</p>
<p>Since you posted your question about controlling multiple Ki Pro Minis using the LANC function I’ve been asking around about which controller will do the job reliably but no one seems to have a definitive answer. It seems as though most people who need to control multiple units are using the hard wired ethernet gang control function and just using the web-based master controller screen. Ultimately, the LANC way of doing things would not be nearly as clumsy as using a laptop. You obviously must have upgraded your KPM firmware to v.2.5 otherwise the LANC wouldn’t work at all, but as far as getting reliable control of the start/stop LANC commands is something I’m not able to help you with. I don’t use the LANC function myself so I’m probably not the best person to ask. If you want to read more about the Ki Pro Mini gang record function turn to page 45 in the KPM owner’s manual, PDF version.</p>
<p>- Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ki Pro Mini and Time Code by Patrick King</title>
		<link>http://reeltimevideoworks.com/blog/ki-pro-mini-and-time-code/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeltimevideoworks.com/?p=731#comment-311</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a question...

I want to trigger four Ki Pro minis via some kind of LANC record trigger. 

I have achieved this using a Sony Z1&#039;s LANC interface direct into the first KPM in the chain, but it&#039;s a fairly cumbersome runstop trigger.

Do you know of an off the shelf device that will serve this purpose? I have tried a Libec LANC remote, but no joy.

Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s a question…</p>
<p>I want to trigger four Ki Pro minis via some kind of LANC record trigger. </p>
<p>I have achieved this using a Sony Z1’s LANC interface direct into the first KPM in the chain, but it’s a fairly cumbersome runstop trigger.</p>
<p>Do you know of an off the shelf device that will serve this purpose? I have tried a Libec LANC remote, but no joy.</p>
<p>Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ki Pro Mini and Time Code by Don Greening</title>
		<link>http://reeltimevideoworks.com/blog/ki-pro-mini-and-time-code/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Greening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeltimevideoworks.com/?p=731#comment-228</guid>
		<description>Hi Tony,

Thanks so much for your comments. It&#039;s gratifying to know that AJA is aware of the Time Of Day TC recording difference and how the problems associated with it have been dealt with by the Ki Pro development team. Your explanation is greatly appreciated and the solution logical. Personally, It isn&#039;t an issue for me because I normally use regular TC unless asked to do otherwise, which is what happened in this case. I would also like to thank Jon Thorn from AJA who helped resolve the problem by steering me in the right direction over at DVInfoNet. Perhaps future Ki Pro Mini operation manuals will mention the SDI Time of Day issue in a more prominent manner.

Cheers,
- Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony,</p>
<p>Thanks so much for your comments. It’s gratifying to know that AJA is aware of the Time Of Day TC recording difference and how the problems associated with it have been dealt with by the Ki Pro development team. Your explanation is greatly appreciated and the solution logical. Personally, It isn’t an issue for me because I normally use regular TC unless asked to do otherwise, which is what happened in this case. I would also like to thank Jon Thorn from AJA who helped resolve the problem by steering me in the right direction over at DVInfoNet. Perhaps future Ki Pro Mini operation manuals will mention the SDI Time of Day issue in a more prominent manner.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
– Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ki Pro Mini and Time Code by Tony Cacciarelli</title>
		<link>http://reeltimevideoworks.com/blog/ki-pro-mini-and-time-code/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Cacciarelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 18:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeltimevideoworks.com/?p=731#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Hi Don,
 
Tony Cacciarelli from AJA Video here.  We do actually know about this.  When the Ki Pro or Ki Pro Mini is to be ARMed based on the timecode, it will watch the timecode value over the SDI cable for a change and will start recording once is sees that happen.
 
If the timecode value being output by the camera is Time of Day, then the timecode is continuously changing, even when the camera is not recording.  So, the Ki Pro sees this change and would start recording even though the camera isn&#039;t in record.  To avoid this, you have to set the ARM value to REC ONLY, which requires you to press the RECORD button on the Ki Pro in order to start a recording.
 
With the new v2.5 firmware on Ki Pro Mini, the LANC port is enabled, which allows the Ki Pro Mini to be ARMed using a trigger over the LANC cable (assuming you have a LANC-enabled camera, of course). This allows for Time of Day timecode to be used since the ARMing is happening based on the LANC signal, not watching for changing timecode over the SDI cable.
 
Thanks,
 
Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Don,</p>
<p>Tony Cacciarelli from AJA Video here.  We do actually know about this.  When the Ki Pro or Ki Pro Mini is to be ARMed based on the timecode, it will watch the timecode value over the SDI cable for a change and will start recording once is sees that happen.</p>
<p>If the timecode value being output by the camera is Time of Day, then the timecode is continuously changing, even when the camera is not recording.  So, the Ki Pro sees this change and would start recording even though the camera isn’t in record.  To avoid this, you have to set the ARM value to REC ONLY, which requires you to press the RECORD button on the Ki Pro in order to start a recording.</p>
<p>With the new v2.5 firmware on Ki Pro Mini, the LANC port is enabled, which allows the Ki Pro Mini to be ARMed using a trigger over the LANC cable (assuming you have a LANC-enabled camera, of course). This allows for Time of Day timecode to be used since the ARMing is happening based on the LANC signal, not watching for changing timecode over the SDI cable.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Audio-Video Relationship by Chuck Denison</title>
		<link>http://reeltimevideoworks.com/blog/the-audio-video-relationship/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Denison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 19:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeltimevideoworks.com/?p=648#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Don. I finally had a moment to look for a response. I wish I had a limiter filter in my old Premeire Pro. It may be something to look forward to when I upgrade. Shawn thinks I should stay with Premiere, perhaps movng to CS6 coming out this spring. Perhaps things like a flicker filter will be available on Premiere. Lets hope. Have a great day!
-- Chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Don. I finally had a moment to look for a response. I wish I had a limiter filter in my old Premeire Pro. It may be something to look forward to when I upgrade. Shawn thinks I should stay with Premiere, perhaps movng to CS6 coming out this spring. Perhaps things like a flicker filter will be available on Premiere. Lets hope. Have a great day!<br />
– Chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XDCAM EX Quick TIp #1 by Don Greening</title>
		<link>http://reeltimevideoworks.com/blog/xdcam-ex-quick-tip/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Greening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 06:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeltimevideoworks.com/?p=668#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying hard to make this a worthwhile &#039;go to&#039; resource. Thanks for posting your comment. BTW, the feeling&#039;s mutual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m trying hard to make this a worthwhile ‘go to’ resource. Thanks for posting your comment. BTW, the feeling’s mutual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XDCAM EX Quick TIp #1 by kate</title>
		<link>http://reeltimevideoworks.com/blog/xdcam-ex-quick-tip/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 05:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeltimevideoworks.com/?p=668#comment-132</guid>
		<description>thanks don, what a great resource you are!  and a good friend too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks don, what a great resource you are!  and a good friend too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Audio-Video Relationship by Don Greening</title>
		<link>http://reeltimevideoworks.com/blog/the-audio-video-relationship/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Greening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reeltimevideoworks.com/?p=648#comment-115</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found that a finished soundtrack that peaks at -10dBu is about right. During the edit you can set your limiter filter to this and then attenuate or &#039;gain up&#039; the volume for the whole track with the same filter so that it&#039;s louder overall but still peaks at minus 10. This adds consistency to the audio and makes the softer passages louder so the viewer doesn&#039;t have to strain to hear them.

As for recording, the audio circuits perform differently between camera types so it&#039;s more a matter of testing than anything else. Overall, I want the recording volume to be at the higher end of the scale but not so much that sudden jumps in volume will clip. This is called headroom and some cameras handle it better than others. Every camera has an audio pre-amp circuit and some are easier to overload than others. This is why a lot of camera operators will have channel 1 set as I&#039;ve described above and channel 2 set lower in case of sudden loud bursts. If channel 1 clips just switch to chan.2 during the edit.

- Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve found that a finished soundtrack that peaks at –10dBu is about right. During the edit you can set your limiter filter to this and then attenuate or ‘gain up’ the volume for the whole track with the same filter so that it’s louder overall but still peaks at minus 10. This adds consistency to the audio and makes the softer passages louder so the viewer doesn’t have to strain to hear them.</p>
<p>As for recording, the audio circuits perform differently between camera types so it’s more a matter of testing than anything else. Overall, I want the recording volume to be at the higher end of the scale but not so much that sudden jumps in volume will clip. This is called headroom and some cameras handle it better than others. Every camera has an audio pre-amp circuit and some are easier to overload than others. This is why a lot of camera operators will have channel 1 set as I’ve described above and channel 2 set lower in case of sudden loud bursts. If channel 1 clips just switch to chan.2 during the edit.</p>
<p>- Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

